Syrie : sharia, pillages et règlements de comptes.

Nous sortons de notre "retraite" de quelques jours en cette fin d'année pour répondre à une question d'un de nos lecteurs à propos d'un commentaire d'un article dans le Figaro traitant de la Syrie.

Voici le commentaire en question :

"Encore du très très grand journalisme façon Skype qui à 2000 km de distance ne donne la parole qu'à une partie au conflit et qui ne trouve rien de mieux pour illustrer le papier que d'insérer une vidéo produite par une officine d'influence américaine, qui sert désormais d'idiote utile aux islamistes et qui, indirectement, est complice de la situation qu'elle dénonce. Ca vaut bien un prix Albert-Londres...
Car l'article omet sciemment de mentionner que l'ASL a pillé les silos de blé et démantelé les usines dans la région d'Alep pour revendre le blé et les machines en Turquie. Même certaines boulangeries de la zone occupée par les rebelles envoient leur pain dans le Hatay, plutôt que de le donner aux Syriens. Et tout ça pour acheter des armes plutôt que nourrit la population dont l'ASL a la responsabilité!
La région d'Alep est une des régions les plus riches de Syrie et elle est dévastée par les hordes dont l'auteur fait indirectement l'apologie. Le reste du pays en revanche ne manque pas de nourriture, même si les prix ont augmenté, ce qui démontre que l'opposition soutenue par l'Occident et le Golfe est parfaitement incompétente pour administrer le pays et ce sera une terrible catastrophe humanitaire pour 23 millions de personnes si elle prend le pouvoir. Mais ça, nos dirigeants, les multinationales et les plumitifs qui sont leurs idiots utiles n'en ont cure."

Notre lecteur nous demande notre avis sur cette histoire de silos pillés et de revente de machines, voire d'usines entières, à la Turquie.

C'est parfaitement vrai !

Nos alliés salafistes et d'Al Qaeda sont occupés à deux choses en Syrie : 

1) Créer le Califat Islamique dont ils rêvent afin d'établir la sharia, où à tout le moins leur interprétation de cette dernière. A cette fin, bien évidemment, il leur faut chasser toutes les minorités, comme tous les sunnis qui ne sont pas aussi extrémistes qu'eux, pour établir un état islamique religieusement nettoyé (ici, ici, ici, ici, ici, ici, ici, ici, ici).

2) Piller et revendre leur butin afin de se procurer le maximum d'argent. En ce qui concerne les silos à blé et les matières alimentaires, ils préfèrent revendre au prix fort le résultat de leurs larcins plutôt que de les distribuer à la population. Le plus comique de l'histoire c'est la rivalité qui se développe entre les différentes brigades pour le butin, jusqu'à dégénérer en bataille rangée où en assassinat entre "frères"...

En confirmation de cela, voici quelques extraits d'un article du Guardian du 27 Décembre 2012 sur la situation (ici). Si même le Guardian se préoccupe de cette question, c'est que la situation réelle est encore bien pire.

"It wasn't the government that killed the Syrian rebel commander Abu Jameel. It was the fight for his loot. The motive for his murder lay in a great warehouse in Aleppo which his unit had captured a week before. The building had been full of rolled steel, which was seized by the fighters as spoils of war.
But squabbling developed over who would take the greater share of the loot and a feud developed between commanders. Threats and counter-threats ensued over the following days.
Abu Jameel survived one assassination attempt when his car was fired on. A few days later his enemies attacked again, and this time they were successful. His bullet-riddled body was found, handcuffed, in an alley in the town of al-Bab."

" (...) a new phase has been reached in the war. Looting has become a way of life.
"Spoils" have now become the main drive for many units as battalion commanders seek to increase their power."

"In the first month and a half the rebels were really a united revolutionary group," Abu Ismael said. "But now they are different. There are those who are here only to loot and make money, and some still fight."  

"One of the commanders present had led an operation into the predominantly Kurdish neighbourhood of Ashrafiya in Aleppo, but according to several fighters who were there the action failed when the army counterattacked because the rebel support units that were supposed to reinforce the front instead turned their attention to looting."

"The war in Aleppo is not only funded by what can be appropriated by the various units, but also by the patronage that they can attract from sponsors outside Syria, a factor which has also contributed to the myriad forming and re-forming of units, all of which control individual fiefdoms in the city.
All of this has fuelled rivalries and ever-shifting allegiances, factors that have undermined the struggle to defeat the forces of the Syrian president.
Fighting units often exist only because of their sponsors. If a sponsor loses interest a battalion is dissolved and the men join another, better-funded battalion. Battalions are often named after historical Arab or Ottoman figures in order to help lure money from the Gulf kingdoms or from Turkey."

"Abara is young and short, in his early 20s, with fair hair and few pimples scattered on his face. He had defected from the army a year earlier. We had first met three months earlier when he was leading his men through the alleyways of Salahuddin, and many of those fighters had been killed or maimed since then.
He was now sitting with the survivors on a cold concrete floor in an abandoned building a block away from government troops. Between the men was a jar of greasy-looking green olives, a bag of bread, a plate of olive oil and some thyme. "It's much worse now," Abara said of the war. "Now it's copper and wheat that commanders are after instead of liberating the city."

"When the army attacked us last week the unit that was here abandoned their posts and withdrew," he said.

Now, he said, in order to regain the lost territory he would have to fight house to house. "Why should I, when the rest are looting?"

He added wearily: "One day when the war against Bashar is over, another war will start against the looters and thieves."
(Sources : The Guardian - 27.12.2012)